iOS vs Android UA: The Key Differences
iOS has higher ARPU and CPI and SKAN-limited measurement; Android is cheaper with richer data and broader reach. How to prioritize between them.
Key takeaways
- iOS has higher ARPU and CPI, with SKAN-constrained measurement after ATT.
- Android offers cheaper installs, richer data, and broader emerging-market reach.
- Subscription apps often lead on iOS for LTV; Android wins on volume and geo expansion.
iOS and Android are not just two stores, they are two different UA environments with different economics, measurement and audiences. Treating them the same is a common and costly mistake.
Measurement
Since ATT, iOS measurement runs through SKAN with aggregated, delayed and limited signal. Android still offers richer, more deterministic data. That gap changes how confidently you can optimize on each platform.
Economics
iOS users tend to spend more, so ARPU is higher, but so is CPI and competition. Android installs are usually cheaper with lower ARPU. The right platform depends on whether your model rewards spend-heavy users or volume.
Audience and geo
iOS skews toward tier-one, higher-income markets, while Android dominates much of Asia, LatAm, MENA and other emerging regions. Your target geos often decide the platform split as much as economics do.
How to prioritize
Subscription apps chasing LTV frequently lead on iOS, then expand to Android for volume and emerging markets. But the honest answer follows your economics and audience: measure each platform on its own payback, not a blended average.
Deciding how to split UA across iOS and Android?
See the UA service